ReviewReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2025
Intraoral stent for head and neck radiotherapy using 3D technology: an integrative review.
Review in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to conduct an integrative review on intraoral stents for head and neck radiotherapy using 3D technology. For data collection, the words were used: "intraoral stent", "oral cancer" and "3D", with their combination performed using the Boolean operator AND. Only articles in English were selected from the PubMed and LILACS databases. The search process was conducted between August and October 2024. Eight articles were found, of which seven met the established inclusion criteria. The articles demonstrate that the use of 3D technology optimizes the fabrication time of intraoral stents, directs isodose distribution to the treated area while preserving adjacent healthy tissues, and reduces side effects during the irradiation period. Evident advances in the literature regarding the innovation in the production of intraoral stents, such as 3D printing, have demonstrated effectiveness and benefits in this treatment modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.