Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41498046›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2024

MODELING THE VISIBILITY DISTRIBUTION FOR RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING WITH APPLICATION TO POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION.

Katherine R McLaughlin, Lisa G Johnston, Xhevat Jakupi, Dafina Gexha-Bunjaku, Edona Deva, Mark S Handcock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine R McLaughlinDepartment of Statistics, Oregon State University.ORCID 0000-0002-9187-4939
Lisa G JohnstonLGJ Consultants, Inc.
Xhevat JakupiNational Institute of Public Health of Kosovo.
Dafina Gexha-BunjakuNational Institute of Public Health of Kosovo.
Edona DevaCommunity Development Fund.
Mark S HandcockDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, University of California, Los Angeles.ORCID 0000-0002-9985-2785

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is used throughout the world to estimate prevalence and population size for hidden populations. Although RDS is an effective method for enrolling people from key populations in studies, it relies on a partially unknown sampling mechanism, and thus each individual's inclusion probability is unknown. Current estimators for population prevalence, population size, and other outcomes rely on a participant's network size (degree) to approximate their inclusion probability in the sample from the networked population. However, in most RDS studies, a participant's network size is attained via a self-report and is subject to many types of misreporting and bias. Because design-based inclusion probabilities cannot be exactly computed, we instead use the term visibility to describe how likely a person is to be selected to participate in the study. The commonly used successive sampling population size estimation (SS-PSE) framework to estimate population sizes from RDS data relies on self-reported network sizes in the model for the sampling mechanism. We propose an enhancement of the SS-PSE framework that adds a measurement error model for visibility used in place of the self-reported network size and a model for the number of recruits an individual can enroll. Inferred visibilities are a way to smooth the degree distribution and bring in outliers as well as a mechanism to deal with missing and invalid network sizes. We demonstrate the performance of visibility SS-PSE on three populations from Kosovo sampled in 2014 using RDS. We also discuss how the visibility modeling framework could be extended to prevalence estimation.

Indexed as

Heaped datahidden populationmeasurement error modelmodel-based survey samplingnetwork sampling

Identifiers

PMID41498046
PMCPMC12768521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.