ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2024
MODELING THE VISIBILITY DISTRIBUTION FOR RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING WITH APPLICATION TO POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the Personal Networks of People Experiencing Homelessness in King County, WA with Aggregate Relational Data.Social networks · 2026Article
- Incidence and risk factors ofBMJ open · 2026Article
- HIV treatment cascade and associated factors among men who have sex with men in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sexual risk behaviors among adolescent men who have sex with men in two Brazilian cities: findings from an RDS-based study.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- MODELING THE VISIBILITY DISTRIBUTION FOR RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING WITH APPLICATION TO POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is used throughout the world to estimate prevalence and population size for hidden populations. Although RDS is an effective method for enrolling people from key populations in studies, it relies on a partially unknown sampling mechanism, and thus each individual's inclusion probability is unknown. Current estimators for population prevalence, population size, and other outcomes rely on a participant's network size (degree) to approximate their inclusion probability in the sample from the networked population. However, in most RDS studies, a participant's network size is attained via a self-report and is subject to many types of misreporting and bias. Because design-based inclusion probabilities cannot be exactly computed, we instead use the term visibility to describe how likely a person is to be selected to participate in the study. The commonly used successive sampling population size estimation (SS-PSE) framework to estimate population sizes from RDS data relies on self-reported network sizes in the model for the sampling mechanism. We propose an enhancement of the SS-PSE framework that adds a measurement error model for visibility used in place of the self-reported network size and a model for the number of recruits an individual can enroll. Inferred visibilities are a way to smooth the degree distribution and bring in outliers as well as a mechanism to deal with missing and invalid network sizes. We demonstrate the performance of visibility SS-PSE on three populations from Kosovo sampled in 2014 using RDS. We also discuss how the visibility modeling framework could be extended to prevalence estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.