ReviewMediators of inflammation2025
Neutrophils in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Roles, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Implications.
Review in Mediators of inflammation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Failed resolution of inflammation in intracerebral haemorrhage.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Neutrophils and Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Circulating NETosis biomarkers predict severity, 12-month functional outcome, and survival after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- RBM15 affects mitophagy in intracerebral hemorrhage by promoting E2F1 nuclear translocation via NXF1.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Neutrophils in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Roles, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Implications.Mediators of inflammation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), characterized by bleeding into the brain parenchyma, is a major cause of adult disability and mortality. The pathophysiology of ICH involves complex processes, including mass effect and subsequent inflammatory responses, which cause severe primary and secondary brain damage. As the first responders in neuroinflammatory reactions, neutrophils are rapidly recruited to the hemorrhage site. They interact with other immune cells, release cytotoxic molecules, and significantly exacerbate neuroinflammation. In the acute phase, neutrophils secrete cytokines, chemokines and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are particularly detrimental to brain tissue. However, in later stages, infiltrated neutrophils can adopt an immunosuppressive phenotype, exerting beneficial effects. Emerging evidence reveals that neutrophils play a multifaceted role in ICH progression, shifting between anti-inflammatory or pro-inflammatory phenotypes depending on brain tissue niche. Hence, tuning neutrophils into a beneficial phenotype represents a promising therapeutic strategy for ICH. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and Web of Science databases for relevant studies published up to July 2025, using keywords including "intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)," "neutrophil," "inflammation," "neuroinflammation," " neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)," "treatment," "therapy," and "therapeutics." In this article, we explore the roles of neutrophils in ICH, encompassing their recruitment, activation mechanisms, interactions with other immune cells, and impact on neuroinflammation and neuronal injury. Furthermore, we discuss therapeutic strategies targeting neutrophil-mediated pathways in ICH, highlighting potential avenues for future research and clinical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.