ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025
Drug-Coated Balloons for De Novo Non-aorto-ostial and Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stenting of bifurcation and non-aorto-ostial coronary lesions presents significant challenges due to geographic miss and restenosis. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) offer an attractive alternative to drug-eluting stents in the treatment of these lesions. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies published from 2001 to 2024 comparing DCBs with plain old balloon angioplasty and/or drug-eluting stents (DES) in de novo coronary bifurcation lesions and non-aorto-ostial (NAO) lesions. A meta-analysis was performed with target lesion failure (TLF) as the selected outcome, defined as a composite of target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death. Results: Eleven studies (4 randomized controlled trials and 7 observational) comprising 2443 patients were included. The median follow-up was 12 months. A random-effects model was applied to account for differences in study design and population despite a low heterogeneity among the studies ( Conclusions: In our meta-analysis, DCBs were associated with a lower rate of TLF compared with plain old balloon angioplasty and DES. These findings suggest that DCBs could be preferred for the treatment of bifurcation and NAO lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.