Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497992›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025

Respiratory Support and Mortality Risk Across the Spectrum of Cardiogenic Shock Severity.

Talal El Zarif, Cesar Caraballo, Angela M Victoria-Castro, Israel Safiriyu, Maria Gabriela Gastanadui, David M Dudzinski, Balimkiz Senman, Carlos Alviar, Guido Tavazzi, Andrea Elliott and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Talal El ZarifDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Cesar CaraballoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Angela M Victoria-CastroSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Israel SafiriyuSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Maria Gabriela GastanaduiSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
David M DudzinskiHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Balimkiz SenmanCritical Care Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Carlos AlviarLeon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Guido TavazziAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Andrea ElliottDivision of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Aniket S RaliDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Mark JacobsDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Jason N KatzLeon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Ann GageCentennial Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
P Elliott MillerSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Intervention (SCAI) SHOCK stages classification schema risk-stratifies patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). The updated 2022 SCAI SHOCK stages removed the use of respiratory support, either noninvasive (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), as a criterion. We sought to investigate the impact of receiving respiratory support on in-hospital mortality for patients with CS stratified by SCAI SHOCK stages. Methods: Utilizing a nationally representative database, adults aged ≥18 years admitted from 2015 to 2023 with a diagnosis of CS were used to assess for the association between respiratory support, either NIV or IMV, on the first day of admission, with in-hospital mortality stratified by SCAI SHOCK stages B through E. We utilized inverse probability treatment weighting, adjusting for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and vasoactive/mechanical circulatory support. Results: We identified 317,325 patients with CS, including 2.4%, 39.0%, 34.2%, and 24.5% with SCAI stages B through E, respectively. Respiratory support was utilized in 38.0% (n = 120,594) of patients, with 5.4% receiving NIV, 33.8% receiving IMV, and 1.1% receiving both on the first day of admission. After inverse probability treatment weighting, respiratory support use remained associated with an increased mortality overall (weighted mean mortality increase of 18.3%; 95% CI, 17.9%-18.7%), when stratified by each SCAI SHOCK stage and in several key sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Compared with patients not receiving respiratory support, the use of respiratory support was associated with an increased mortality for each SCAI stage of CS and could be a simple, easily identifiable CS risk modifier.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockcritical care cardiologyinvasive mechanical ventilationnoninvasive ventilationrespiratory support

Identifiers

PMID41497992
PMCPMC12766037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.