Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497962›Full record

ReviewThe journal of poultry science2026

Egg Consumption and Human Health: A Comprehensive Review of the Effects on Serum Lipids, Antioxidant Status, and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Yoshimi Kishimoto, Norie Sugihara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yoshimi KishimotoDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Setsunan University, 45-1 Nagaotouge-cho, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-0101, Japan.
Norie SugiharaFaculty of Health and Social Services, Kanagawa University of Human Services, 1-10-1 Heisei-cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, 238-8522, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eggs are a highly nutritious food and an excellent source of carotenoids, lutein and zeaxanthin, which contribute to antioxidant defenses and ocular health. However, eggs have been viewed skeptically because of their impact on serum cholesterol levels. This review summarizes the evidence from clinical trials, observational studies, and worldwide ecological studies relating egg consumption to serum lipid profiles, antioxidant status, and cardiovascular outcomes. Recent meta-analyses on egg consumption have reported an increase in serum cholesterol but limited or no impact on atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease risk. Clinical studies have reported that the additional consumption of an egg per day for 4 weeks improved high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels and decreased oxidized low-density lipoprotein levels. Most recently, a cross-sectional study of Japanese patients who underwent coronary angiography reported no significant association between egg intake and the prevalence of coronary artery disease or multi-vessel disease. Among patients not receiving lipid-lowering drugs, moderate egg intake (3-4 eggs/week) was associated with a lower prevalence of multi-vessel disease. Furthermore, worldwide ecological analyses have identified a significant negative association between egg intake and the incidence and mortality of ischemic heart disease. Given their high nutritional value, relatively low cost, and the evidence presented, eggs could contribute to healthy diets in many countries worldwide.

Indexed as

antioxidantcardiovascular healthcarotenoidscholesterolegg

Identifiers

PMID41497962
PMCPMC12765572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.