ReviewCureus2025
A Systematic Review on Caesarean Niche and Postmenstrual Spotting Syndrome: The Scar That Speaks.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barbed Double-Needle Suture for Cesarean Section Uterine Incision Closure: Postoperative Pain and 12-Month Scar Outcomes.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global increase in caesarean section rates has intensified concern about long-term gynaecological outcomes. Among these, the caesarean scar defect, also known as isthmocele or niche, has emerged as a notable cause of postmenstrual spotting, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility. Despite its clinical relevance, diagnostic criteria and management strategies remain heterogeneous and poorly standardised. This systematic review synthesised existing evidence on the association between caesarean scar defects and postmenstrual spotting, while also describing commonly used diagnostic approaches, symptom profiles, and reported management outcomes. Comprehensive searches of major medical databases were undertaken, with records managed in EndNote X9 and findings synthesised narratively. Across the literature, postmenstrual spotting was the predominant manifestation, frequently accompanied by pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, and infertility. Hysteroscopic resection was the most widely reported intervention, with most reports describing improvement in bleeding patterns and related symptoms, whereas laparoscopic and vaginal repairs were more often used in women with thin residual myometrium or fertility concerns and were associated with favourable reproductive outcomes. Overall, the evidence base was moderate in quality, limited by small sample sizes and clinical heterogeneity. Caesarean scar defects show a strong association with postmenstrual spotting and related morbidity, underscoring the need for standardised diagnostic definitions and well-designed prospective studies to guide clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.