Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497951›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

A Systematic Review on Caesarean Niche and Postmenstrual Spotting Syndrome: The Scar That Speaks.

Saja Saifaldeen Abdalrahman Damra, Athkar Yasir Hussien Abdalla, Sara Awad Fageer Farah, Salma Awadelkarim Elshikh Ahmed, Abdelrahman Edris Osman Ali, Roua Ahmed Abbas, Asim Ahmed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saja Saifaldeen Abdalrahman DamraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Gadarif University, Gadarif, SDN.
Athkar Yasir Hussien AbdallaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Gezira, Wad Madani, SDN.
Sara Awad Fageer FarahFaculty of Medicine, Red Sea University, Port Sudan, SDN.
Salma Awadelkarim Elshikh AhmedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bahri, Khartoum, SDN.
Abdelrahman Edris Osman AliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Omdurman Islamic University, Khartoum, SDN.
Roua Ahmed AbbasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Sudan International University, Khartoum, SDN.
Asim AhmedDepartment of Research and Studies, 10 Scholars Academy, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global increase in caesarean section rates has intensified concern about long-term gynaecological outcomes. Among these, the caesarean scar defect, also known as isthmocele or niche, has emerged as a notable cause of postmenstrual spotting, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility. Despite its clinical relevance, diagnostic criteria and management strategies remain heterogeneous and poorly standardised. This systematic review synthesised existing evidence on the association between caesarean scar defects and postmenstrual spotting, while also describing commonly used diagnostic approaches, symptom profiles, and reported management outcomes. Comprehensive searches of major medical databases were undertaken, with records managed in EndNote X9 and findings synthesised narratively. Across the literature, postmenstrual spotting was the predominant manifestation, frequently accompanied by pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, and infertility. Hysteroscopic resection was the most widely reported intervention, with most reports describing improvement in bleeding patterns and related symptoms, whereas laparoscopic and vaginal repairs were more often used in women with thin residual myometrium or fertility concerns and were associated with favourable reproductive outcomes. Overall, the evidence base was moderate in quality, limited by small sample sizes and clinical heterogeneity. Caesarean scar defects show a strong association with postmenstrual spotting and related morbidity, underscoring the need for standardised diagnostic definitions and well-designed prospective studies to guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

abnormal uterine bleedingcaesarean scar defecthysteroscopyinfertilityisthmocoelelaparoscopypostmenstrual spotting

Identifiers

PMID41497951
PMCPMC12766140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.