ReviewCureus2025
Transforming Emergency Care Through Telemedicine: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Operational Delays in Prehospital Trauma Interventions: Evidence from a Romanian Cohort.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Advancements in smart healthcare in emergency trauma care: from intelligent triage to prognostic prediction.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine has fleetly evolved from a niche result to a central pillar in modern emergency and critical care systems. This narrative review delves into the multifaceted role of telemedicine in emergency settings, tracing its historical development, present applications, and future possibilities. It examines how telemedicine islands geographical and infrastructural gaps, particularly in underserved communities, by enabling timely access to specialist care similar to telestroke services and remote ferocious care. Substantiation highlights advancements in clinical outcomes, functional effectiveness, and patient satisfaction, with global case studies demonstrating successful perpetration across both high- and low-resource settings. Despite these advances, challenges persist. Technological restrictions, regulatory barriers, digital knowledge gaps, and unlikeness in assent continue to hamper wide relinquishment. This review discusses these obstacles and underscores the significance of strategic investment, cross-sector collaboration, and policy reform. Arising inventions, including artificial intelligence, wearable devices, and scalable telehealth platforms, signal promising directions for perfecting reach and adaptability in emergency systems. Additionally, this paper identifies crucial areas for unborn research, including long-term outgrowth assessment and telemedicine's part in disaster and pandemic response. By synthesizing current substantiation and practical perceptivity, this review aims to inform clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers about the transformative eventuality and ongoing challenges of telemedicine in emergency care. Eventually, it calls for sustained invention, equity-concentrated perpetration, and cooperative sweats to completely realize telemedicine's pledge in erecting a more accessible, responsive, and flexible emergency care geography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.