ArticleCureus2025
Effectiveness of Long-Term Shichimotsukokato Administration on the eGFR Slope in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Single-Arm Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to rise worldwide. Patients with CKD are exposed to increased risks of end-stage kidney disease, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Despite recent pharmacological advances, therapeutic options for CKD remain limited. Shichimotsukokato (SCMKT), a representative Kampo formula in Japanese Traditional Medicine composed of seven crude drugs, has historically been used to treat CKD. Experimental studies have demonstrated its renoprotective and antihypertensive effects. However, the clinical evidence of SCMKT for CKD patients remains limited. To evaluate the effectiveness of the long-term SCMKT administration on renal function, proteinuria, and blood pressure in patients with CKD, we conducted a retrospective, single-arm, observational study. Methods This study targeted outpatients with CKD who were treated with SCMKT. The study was conducted at Fukushima Medical University Aizu Medical Center and Tenjinbashi Clinic from April 2019 to May 2025 (UMIN000058358). Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had been prescribed SCMKT continuously for one year, and had available estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) data from one year before initiation, at initiation, and one year after the initiation of SCMKT. The primary endpoint was the change in the eGFR slope between the pre-treatment and post-treatment periods. The pre-treatment eGFR slope was determined from one year before the initiation of SCMKT, and the post-treatment slope from initiation to one year after. The eGFR slope was calculated using the least-squares regression method. Secondary endpoints included changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, qualitative proteinuria, and the occurrence of adverse events. Results A total of 21 patients who were prescribed SCMKT were screened from both institutions. Finally, 12 patients were included in our study (mean age, 77.8 years; male, seven patients (58.3%)). The mean baseline eGFR was 38.7 ± 10.0 mL/min/1.73 m², and 9 patients (75.0 %) were classified as CKD stage G3b. Hypertensive nephrosclerosis was the most common primary cause of CKD. There were 11 patients (91.7 %) with concomitant hypertension, and 9 patients (75.0 %) were prescribed renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors. The mean daily dose of SCMKT (Tsumura & Co., Tokyo, Japan) was 5.6 g. The mean eGFR slope significantly improved after SCMKT administration compared with the pre-treatment period (pre-treatment vs. post-treatment, -4.9 ± 7.3 vs. 5.4 ± 5.4 mL/min/1.73 m²/year;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.