ArticleCureus2025
Ultrasound-Assisted Minimally Invasive Clavicle Plate Removal.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the feasibility of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to aid minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for clavicular plate removal. We present a case of a 29-year-old male who sustained a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture after a bike accident. On day four, post-injury, he underwent an open reduction and internal fixation with an anatomic 3.5mm locking plate, complicated by numbness of the anterior chest extending to the medial arm. Four years post-operatively, he presented for hardware irritation, which was palpable on physical exam. After unsuccessful conservative treatments, the patient elected to undergo hardware removal utilizing POCUS as the mode for a minimally invasive approach. The MIS approach, known for reducing wound complications and nerve damage, is traditionally confirmed using a C-arm image intensifier. POCUS, being a portable and non-ionizing imaging modality, serves as an alternative to traditional methods. POCUS allows for a more precise surgical incision that is smaller than the traditional open approach, with the additional advantage of visualization of neurovascular structures compared to a C-arm. Post-operatively, the patient's course was uncomplicated with no surgical site numbness and participation in previous activities at six weeks. Although additional training is required to become an expert in acquiring ultrasound skills, most hardware can be easily located through ultrasound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.