ArticleCureus2025
Focal Pancreatic Parenchymal Atrophy in Main Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Although upstream pancreatic atrophy (UPA) is a characteristic finding in main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (MD-IPMNs) of the pancreas, the relationship between MD-IPMNs and focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy (FPPA), which is an indicator of early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the relationship. Methods From the 49 patients diagnosed with MD-IPMNs using the resected specimens from June 2003 to December 2023, 19 patients were selected to clarify the clinical characteristics of FPPA for MD-IPMN patients. The primary outcome measure was the frequency of FPPA/UPA. Secondary outcome measures were (1) the locational relationship between MD-IPMN and FPPA and (2) the clinicopathological differences between those atrophic types. Results FPPA and UPA were observed in 4 (21%) and 12 (63%) patients, respectively. When the clinicopathological factors of FPPA and UPA patients were compared, only the diameter of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) significantly differed (median MPD diameter: 6 mm vs. 11 mm, p = 0.017). Of the four patients with FPPA, the histological extent of the MD-IPMN lesion was within that of FPPA in three patients (75%) and was concordant with that of FPPA only in one patient (25%). Conclusions FPPAs were detected in approximately 20% of resected MD-IPMNs, and 75% of those MD-IPMNs were histologically included in the area of the FPPAs. Since the MPD diameter was significantly smaller for MD-IPMNs with FPPAs than those with UPAs, MD-IPMNs with FPPAs may be biologically related to the mild dilation of the MPD, such as lesions at an early stage or less mucin secretion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.