Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497915›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Workplace Safety Among Postgraduate Residents and Interns in India: A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices.

Jamunarani Srirangaramasamy, Raghunandan Ramanathan, Arunagiri Gunasekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jamunarani SrirangaramasamyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Bhaarath Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Raghunandan RamanathanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, IND.
Arunagiri GunasekarDepartment of Medical Education, Government Medical College and Hospital, Thiruvallur, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Workplace violence against healthcare professionals represents a major occupational health danger that affects workers all around the world. Medical interns and postgraduate residents face increased risks during their training period because they are new to their profession, and they work long shifts in dangerous hospital settings. The research examined knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding workplace safety among interns and postgraduates practicing in South India. Methods The descriptive cross-sectional study involved 273 medical students from public and private medical schools in South India. A structured questionnaire addressed knowledge of legal protections, workplace violence exposure, psychological impact, institutional safety infrastructure, policy implementation, and support needs. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and 95% confidence intervals, were calculated. The data analysis was conducted in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 30 (Released 2024; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York), with a p-value < 0.05 considered significant. Results Among 273 participants, 47.6% reported experiencing workplace violence or harassment. The majority of incidents consisted of verbal abuse, which made up 62.3% of cases; physical violence occurred in 21.1% of incidents, and sexual harassment happened in 13.7% of cases. Only 39.2% were aware of legal protections such as the Tamil Nadu Medicare Act 2008, and 54.2% knew appropriate reporting procedures. The safety attitudes of hospital staff showed that 50.9% felt unsafe on hospital grounds, yet 76.6% experienced workplace safety-related stress and anxiety. The study found that 62.6% of respondents experienced career impact, with 40.3% rating the impact as maximum severity. The facility showed major infrastructure problems: 59.7% of respondents reported sufficient CCTV coverage, 72.9% encountered infrastructure issues, and 31.1% could access night transportation. The implementation of policies failed because only 38.8% of institutions had standard operating procedures, and 21.2% of staff members received ongoing safety training. The data show that interns face greater risks than residents across all measured categories. Conclusions The research identifies multiple deficiencies in legal protection knowledge, together with insufficient workplace safety measures, ineffective policy enforcement, and frequent workplace violence incidents, which affect medical students in South India. The healthcare system requires comprehensive solutions to establish safe medical training environments, as these solutions must address facility conditions, staff education, policy enforcement, and psychological support for healthcare staff.

Indexed as

awarenesshealthcare workershospital safetymedical workplace violenceoccupational safety and healthworkplace violence prevalence

Identifiers

PMID41497915
PMCPMC12766136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.