ArticleJournal of osteoporosis2025
Optimizing Outcomes in Vertebral Fractures: The Impact of Intercostal Nerve Block on Costal Pain.
Article in Journal of osteoporosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multivariate Risk Factor Analysis and Clinical Prediction Model Construction of Intercostal Neuralgia Following Single-Segment Osteoporotic Thoracic Vertebral Compression Fractures.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing Outcomes in Vertebral Fractures: The Impact of Intercostal Nerve Block on Costal Pain.Journal of osteoporosis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of intercostal nerve block (INB) for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with associated costal pain. Methods: We reviewed clinical data from patients with thoracic OVCF and costal pain admitted to our hospital between January 2021 and January 2024. Patients were divided into an observation group, receiving percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and INB, and a control group, receiving PVP alone. Baseline data, intraoperative parameters, deformity improvement (anterior vertebral body height [AVH] and local Cobb angle), and clinical symptom improvement (visual analog scale [VAS] scores for back and costal pain) were compared between the groups. Risk factors for residual costal pain within the control group were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine threshold values for the identified risk factors. Results: The study included 305 patients, 150 in the observation group and 155 in the control group. The groups were statistically comparable in baseline data. Compared with the control group, the observation group had a longer operative time (40.7 ± 5.5 vs. 32.4 ± 3.8 min, Conclusions: OVCF-related costal pain can be effectively alleviated by PVP combined with INB; however, INB lengthens operative time and increases radiation exposure. PVP alone can relieve costal pain in patients with a disease duration of ≤ 15.5 days; otherwise, concomitant INB is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.