ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2026
One in three reports pain in a given week: a one-season prospective study on prevalence of pain and analgesic use in amateur female and male football players.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To study the prevalence of pain and analgesic use in amateur football players and explore sex-based and age-based differences. Methods: A prospective cohort study of 316 amateur football players (185 females, 131 males), mean age 20 years (range 15-54). Baseline data on demographics and pain history in the preceding season were collected. Players reported training/match participation, pain, analgesic use and injuries every 2 weeks over a 7-month season (April-October 2023). Results: 2439 weekly reports were analysed. Weekly pain prevalence was 40.7% (95% CI 36.4% to 45.4%) in female players and 37.2% (32.4% to 42.7%) in male players. Moderate to severe pain was more frequently reported in youth females than youth males (weekly prevalence 20.5% (15.8% to 26.8%) vs 13.1% (9.6% to 17.9%), p=0.032). Female players reported more analgesic use than male players (27.6% (23.8% to 32.1%) vs 11.2% (8.4% to 14.8%), p<0.001). Gradual-onset injuries were the predominant cause of pain (47% in females, 50% in males). Over-the-counter paracetamol (female 70%, male 61%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (female 67%, male 44%) were most commonly used. Analgesic use was primarily driven by non-injury-related pain in females and gradual-onset injuries in males. Conclusions: Pain was common among amateur football players, with more than one-third of players reporting pain in a given week. Female youth players reported higher prevalence of moderate to severe pain, and both female youths and female adults used more analgesics than male counterparts. These findings call for sex-specific pain strategies and educational programmes targeting pain and medication management in amateur sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.