ArticleJournal of electrical bioimpedance2025
Cycling exercise efficiency and economy: Exploring the role of phase angle.
Article in Journal of electrical bioimpedance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Phase angle (PhA), derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), is considered a non-invasive marker of cellular health and membrane integrity. Whether PhA relates to muscular efficiency during exercise remains unclear. Methods: This pilot study investigated the association between PhA and delta efficiency (DE), gross efficiency (GE), and exercise economy (EC) during submaximal cycling in 30 healthy young adults (15 females, mean age 21.4 ± 3.8 years). Whole-body and lower-body PhA were assessed using multifrequency BIA. Participants completed a graded cycling test (20-80 W) with energy expenditure determined via indirect calorimetry. DE, GE, and EC were calculated using standard procedures, and associations with PhA were examined using Pearson correlations, median-split group comparisons, and multivariable linear regression models adjusting for sex and fat-free mass. Results: Neither whole-body nor lower-body PhA was significantly correlated with DE, GE, or EC (all p > 0.05). Group comparisons based on PhA medians showed no significant differences in performance indicators. The largest observed correlation was between whole-body PhA and GE (r = -0.32, p = 0.081). Regression models adjusting for sex and fat-free mass confirmed that PhA did not independently predict DE, GE, or EC. Conclusions: PhA did not predict submaximal cycling efficiency or economy in healthy young adults. These findings suggest that cellular health, as reflected by PhA, may not directly influence muscular energetics under steady-state conditions. Future studies with larger samples and mechanistic measurements are warranted to clarify this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.