ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Towards Painless Endoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) is crucial for diagnosing digestive tract issues, yet discomfort remains a significant concern. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of patients undergoing GIE in the Shanghai region regarding painless GIE. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, from July 27, 2023, to November 28, 2023, using a questionnaire survey to collect data. Results: A total of 472 valid questionnaires were collected. Among them, 273 (57.8%) were female, and 458 (97.0%) would receive painless GIE. The KAP scores were 7 (4-9) for knowledge, 41 (36.5-46) for attitudes, and 17 (16-20) for practices. Correlation analyses showed that knowledge (r = 0.202, p < 0.001) and attitude (r = 0.290, p < 0.001) were positively correlated with practice. However, the correlation between knowledge and attitude was insignificant. Notably, 47.5% of patients recognized painless GIE as a safe examination method, and 37.1% affirmed its effectiveness in reducing fear. Additionally, 38.8% of respondents would recommend painless GIE to those who need it, although 30.1% would hesitate to visit the hospital because of nausea or discomfort. Multivariate analysis showed that being medical personnel was independently associated with positive practice. Conclusion: Patients undergoing GIE in the Shanghai region exhibit limited knowledge, suboptimal attitudes, and inadequate practices regarding painless GIE. It is imperative to devise and implement targeted educational interventions to enhance patient awareness and foster the adoption of painless endoscopy techniques within clinical settings. Given the global increase in demand for patient-centered endoscopy services, our results may also serve as a useful reference for other countries or regions with similar healthcare systems, sedation practices, or cultural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.