Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497718›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Older adult care efficiency and health outcomes: a meta-analysis of the Chinese and Japanese experiences.

Peng Li, Chokchai Suttawet

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peng LiFaculty of Social Work and Social Welfare, Huachiew Chalermprakiet University, Bang Phli District, Thailand.
Chokchai SuttawetFaculty of Social Work and Social Welfare, Huachiew Chalermprakiet University, Bang Phli District, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid aging of populations in China and Japan, healthcare systems face increasing pressure to enhance efficiency and improve older adult health outcomes. The aim of the study is to use a PRISMA-guided meta-analysis of Chinese and Japanese research on efficiency of older adult care and the multidimensional health outcomes, such as physical, mental and social health using Resource-Based Theory as the main conceptual framework supplemented by Institutional Theory. The research is expected to create policy suggestions that can be applied and associated efficiency with health outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies was conducted in PubMed along with Web of Science, Scopus, and JSTOR which included the keywords "older adult care efficiency," "health outcomes," "China" and "Japan." Preliminary research shows older adult care efficiency creates positive effects on health outcomes although China and Japan demonstrate substantial differences in their connection. The efficiency level depends on three elements which are financial spending along with the number of employees and infrastructure standards. The subgroup data shows noticeable differences exist between urban areas and rural regions and evaluation of policy initiatives. In conclusion, the research demonstrates that efficiency serves as a fundamental factor to enhance health outcomes for older adult people and offers implementation strategies which the Chinese and Japanese service providers as well as other aging population providers can utilize. Through the integration of knowledge from these two nations policy makers can construct flexible approaches to advance global older adult care systems.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalHealth Services for the AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareAgedChinaEast Asian PeopleHumansJapanhealth outcomesinstitutional theorymeta-analysisolder adult care efficiencyresource-based theory

Identifiers

PMID41497718
PMCPMC12766973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.