ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Queryome: Orchestrating Retrieval, Reasoning, and Synthesis across Biomedical Literature.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heat shock-mediated transformation is possible in several Gram-negative bacteria.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid expansion of biomedical literature has made comprehensive manual synthesis increasingly difficult to perform effectively, creating a pressing need for AI systems capable of reasoning across verified evidence rather than merely retrieving it. However, existing retrieval- augmented generation (RAG) methods often fall short when faced with complex biomedical questions that require iterative reasoning and multi-step synthesis. Here, we developed Queryome, a deep research system consisting of specialized large language model (LLM) agents that can adapt their orchestration dynamically to a wide range of queries. Using a hybrid semantic-lexical retrieval engine spanning 28.3 million PubMed abstracts, it performs iterative, evidence-grounded synthesis. On the MIRAGE benchmark, Queryome achieved 88.98 % accuracy, surpassing prior systems by up to 14 points, and improved reasoning accuracy on the biomedical Human's Last Exam (HLE) subset from 15.8% to 19.3%. Moreover, in a task for constructing a review article, it earned the highest composite score in comparison with Deep Research from OpenAI, Google, Perplexity, and Scite.AI, reflecting its strong literature retrieval and synthesis capabilities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.