Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497546›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Light-based Epilation as an Adjunct to Surgery in the Management of Pilonidal Disease: A Meta-analysis.

Mody Kutkut, Ibrahim Khansa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mody KutkutFrom the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Ibrahim KhansaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital-North Austin, Austin, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is currently no widely accepted treatment protocol for pilonidal disease. Although surgery is often the first line of treatment, it is associated with a high recurrence rate. Noninvasive approaches to treating pilonidal disease, such as light-based epilation, have shown promise in small studies. Systematic reviews on this subject have been limited by small sample sizes, lack of comparative groups, and substantial heterogeneity. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to address these limitations and evaluate the effectiveness of light-based epilation as an adjunct to surgery in the treatment of pilonidal disease. Methods: A PubMed search was performed of all studies that evaluated the rate of pilonidal disease recurrence when light-based epilation was used. Only English-language comparative studies with more than 10 subjects and a follow-up longer than 6 months were included. Data from all studies were compiled, and a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of light-based epilation in reducing pilonidal disease recurrence. Results: Eleven comparative studies comprising 804 patients were included, including 3 randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective studies, and 4 retrospective studies. Light-based epilation used as an adjunct to surgery was found to significantly reduce pilonidal disease recurrence compared with surgery alone ( Conclusions: This study demonstrated that light-based epilation as an adjunct to surgery results in significantly lower pilonidal recurrence rates than surgery alone.

Identifiers

PMID41497546
PMCPMC12768063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.