Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497542›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Updates on the Law of Diminishing Returns in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Match.

Abdulaziz Elemosho, Benjamin A Sarac, Jeffrey E Janis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Implications of the Shifting Landscape of Plastic Surgery Training Paradigms.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  3. Expectations and Considerations of Research Fellowships in Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdulaziz ElemoshoFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Benjamin A SaracFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Jeffrey E JanisFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Integrated plastic surgery residency remains highly competitive, with a 2025 match rate of 55.8%. This study aimed to update the previously identified inflection points to assess their ongoing relevance. Methods: The National Resident Matching Program database from 2023 to 2025 was queried, and data on objective resident selection criteria were collected. Criteria were categorized into subgroups, and stepwise comparisons were performed to determine inflection points. Results: Compared with the national average, the chances of matching into integrated plastic surgery residency were significantly reduced with less than 5 contiguous ranks (up to -46.5%), less than 15 publications (up to -28.3%), Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores less than 240 (up to -59%), and less than 5 volunteer experiences (-4.1%). Conversely, more than 15 publications, a USMLE Step 2 score of greater than 240, more than 5 research and volunteer experiences, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, and being a US MD senior were all associated with higher chances of matching, compared with the national average. Between 2023 and 2025, the inflection point went up for the number of publications (15 versus 25) and research experience (5 versus 10). On the other hand, the number of contiguous ranks (15), USMLE Step 2 score (250), and volunteer experiences (10) remained the same over the same period. Conclusions: Updated benchmarks confirm upward shifts in some of the inflection points, reflecting increased competitiveness during the study period. Importantly, applicants should prioritize these metrics strategically, supplemented by qualitative factors such as letters of recommendation to optimize their chances of matching.

Identifiers

PMID41497542
PMCPMC12768197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.