ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Eosinophilic Esophagitis in the Middle East: Insight From a Comprehensive Systematic Review.
Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Patterns and Outcomes of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children and Adolescents at a Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis in the Middle East: Insight From a Comprehensive Systematic Review.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the esophagus, defined by esophageal dysfunction and dense eosinophilic infiltration (≥ 15 eosinophils per HPF) in biopsies, after exclusion of other causes. While its global incidence is rising, data from the Middle East remain limited and fragmented. This systematic review aims to comprehensively synthesize available evidence on EoE in Middle Eastern populations, focusing on clinical presentations, allergic comorbidities, diagnostic practices, histological and endoscopic findings, and management strategies. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted through July 2025. Studies were included if they reported original data on EoE patients from Middle Eastern countries, describing demographics, clinical features, diagnosis, or management. Data extraction and quality appraisal were performed independently by two reviewers, using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools. Results: Sixty seven studies comprising 2870 EoE patients from 11 Middle Eastern countries were included. A pronounced male predominance was observed (male-to-female ratios: approximately 2:1 in adults, 2.5:1 in children). Clinical presentations mirrored global patterns, with dysphagia and food impaction as predominant symptoms. Allergic comorbidities were commonly reported. Diagnostic criteria were consistent, but underdiagnosis and misclassification were noted. Histological and endoscopic findings were broadly in line with international data, though mucosal remodeling and strictures were frequently observed, suggesting diagnostic delays. Management approaches included the use of PPIs, corticosteroids, dietary elimination, and, in selected cases, dupilumab. Conclusions: Middle Eastern EoE patients display clinical features, comorbidities, and management patterns like those seen globally. Unique regional aspects such as dietary exposures, allergic profiles, and diagnostic challenges highlight the need for improved clinician awareness and standardized diagnostic protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.