Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497520›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour in patients diagnosed with non-affective psychosis: a cross-sectional UK study identifying cognitions to target in treatment.

Rowan Diamond, Bao Sheng Loe, Felicity Waite, Felicity Hudson, Sinéad Lambe, Daniel Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rowan DiamondOxford Cognitive Approaches to Psychosis (O-CAP), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Bao Sheng LoeThe Psychometrics Centre, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Felicity WaiteOxford Cognitive Approaches to Psychosis (O-CAP), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Felicity HudsonOxford Cognitive Approaches to Psychosis (O-CAP), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sinéad LambeOxford Cognitive Approaches to Psychosis (O-CAP), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Daniel FreemanOxford Cognitive Approaches to Psychosis (O-CAP), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Better interventions are needed to help individuals diagnosed with psychosis to be more physically active and less sedentary. Cognitions are likely to be crucial in blocking and initiating movement. Our aim was to identify cognitions likely to affect physical inactivity or sedentary behaviour in patients with psychosis in order to inform future research and intervention development. Methods: Item pools of 149 cognitions related to physical activity (46 promoting and 103 blocking) and 156 cognitions related to sedentary behaviour (105 promoting and 51 blocking) were developed with lived experience advisors and administered separately to patients with diagnoses of non-affective psychosis, aged 16 years or older, accessing secondary care mental health services in 43 National Health Service (NHS) providers in England and Wales. The study period was between 6th March 2023 and 19th February 2024. Measures were developed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal reliability and test-retest reliability were assessed. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short form was used to validate the physical activity cognitions measures and the Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire was used to validate the sedentary behaviour cognitions measure. Findings: Nine hundred and seventeen participants with non-affective psychosis were enrolled. 563 patients completed the physical activity item pools and 523 patients completed the sedentary behaviour item pools, with 169 patients completing both questionnaires. 620 (67.6%) patients were men and 286 (31.2%) patients were women. 592 (64.6%) patients were White, 83 (9.1%) were mixed or multiple ethnic origin, 85 (9.3%) were Asian, 133 (14.5%) were Black, 4 (0.4%) were Arab, and 20 (2.2%) were other ethnic groups or preferred not to say. The mean age of the cohort was 42.9 (12.9 [18-81]) years.The Oxford Physical Activity Cognition (OPAC) (Promoting and Blocking) scales comprised eight factors: positive feelings with exercise, anticipation of reward, responsibility to others, negative social appraisal, physical health, hearing voices, preoccupation, and negative feelings towards exercise. The Oxford Sedentary Cognitions Assessments (OSCA) (Promoting and Blocking) comprised 11 factors: purpose, poor physical health, defeatist beliefs, unaware of time passing, low mood, television, sitting to steady mind, purpose, anticipation of reward, responsibility to others, and motivation from others.All four measures had excellent model fits. Internal reliability and test-retest reliability were good. The measures had small associations with self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Interpretation: The cognitive drivers of movement for patients with psychosis appear numerous. There are many different types of content of cognitions that could hinder or facilitate movement in patients diagnosed with psychosis, with a number overlapping across physical activity and sedentary behaviour and a number specific to each. These cognitions could be future plausible targets for interventions to increase movement. Required now is causal evidence of whether these cognitions are amenable to change and, if they are, whether this leads to behavioural change. Further research is also needed to replicate the findings. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Indexed as

BehaviourBeliefsExerciseMental healthSchizophreniaSitting

Identifiers

PMID41497520
PMCPMC12766418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.