ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
A large-scale comparison of clinical outcomes to IBD therapies in White and South Asian ethnicities.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adverse Events Related to Azathioprine Use in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Real-World Cohort Study.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While ethnic differences in IBD phenotype are recognised, the comparative efficacy and safety of common IBD therapies across ethnically diverse populations remain uncertain. This multicentre cohort study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these therapies between White (WH) and South Asian (SA) IBD cohorts. Methods: Demographic, phenotypic and outcome data from the UK IBD BioResource were utilised (BioResource inception date: 1st January 2016; data lock for analysis: 12th May 2023). The primary outcome was treatment response (defined as treatment persistence free of discontinuation or failure) to 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), thiopurines and anti-TNFs. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Ethnic differences in treatment response were evaluated using propensity score weighting and Cox proportional hazards regression. AE occurrence was assessed through logistic regression analysis. Findings: In total, 26,530 patients were included [51.2% females; median age at diagnosis 30 years (IQR 21-43); 96.1% WH, 3.9% SA]. SA were diagnosed at a younger age, began treatment younger than WH, and demonstrated baseline phenotypic differences including more perianal disease in CD. However, no significant differences in treatment response between WH and SA were identified in either CD (reference group WH; thiopurines, HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.53-1.27), p = 0.37; anti-TNFs, HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.34-3.37), p = 0.91] or UC [thiopurines, HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-1.02), p = 0.36; anti-TNFs, HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.92-1.04), p = 0.54]. SA were at significantly increased risk of pancreatitis [HR 2.34 (95% CI 1.37-3.75), p = 0.001] and leucopenia [HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.02-2.84), p = 0.03] with thiopurines, and renal dysfunction with anti-TNFs [HR 4.75 (95% CI 1.55-12.07), p = 0.002]. Interpretation: Treatment efficacy in similar WH and SA IBD patients recruited to the UK IBD BioResource is unaffected by ethnicity but patients from SA ethnic backgrounds are at increased risk of developing pancreatitis and leucopenia with thiopurines, and renal dysfunction with anti-TNFs. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive risk assessment and counselling by clinicians, and emphasise the importance of improving ethnic representation in IBD research. Funding: Bowel Research UK; NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC); NIHR Cambridge BRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.