Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497517›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

A large-scale comparison of clinical outcomes to IBD therapies in White and South Asian ethnicities.

Sharmili Balarajah, Laura Martinez-Gili, James L Alexander, Benjamin H Mullish, Robert W Perry, Jia V Li, Julian R Marchesi, Miles Parkes, Timothy R Orchard, Lucy C Hicks and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sharmili BalarajahDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK.
Laura Martinez-GiliDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK.
James L AlexanderDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK.
Benjamin H MullishDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK.
Robert W PerryDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK.
Jia V LiDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK.
Julian R MarchesiDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK.
Miles ParkesDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.
Timothy R OrchardDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK.
Lucy C HicksDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK.
Horace R T WilliamsDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK.
UK IBD BioResource Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While ethnic differences in IBD phenotype are recognised, the comparative efficacy and safety of common IBD therapies across ethnically diverse populations remain uncertain. This multicentre cohort study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these therapies between White (WH) and South Asian (SA) IBD cohorts. Methods: Demographic, phenotypic and outcome data from the UK IBD BioResource were utilised (BioResource inception date: 1st January 2016; data lock for analysis: 12th May 2023). The primary outcome was treatment response (defined as treatment persistence free of discontinuation or failure) to 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), thiopurines and anti-TNFs. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Ethnic differences in treatment response were evaluated using propensity score weighting and Cox proportional hazards regression. AE occurrence was assessed through logistic regression analysis. Findings: In total, 26,530 patients were included [51.2% females; median age at diagnosis 30 years (IQR 21-43); 96.1% WH, 3.9% SA]. SA were diagnosed at a younger age, began treatment younger than WH, and demonstrated baseline phenotypic differences including more perianal disease in CD. However, no significant differences in treatment response between WH and SA were identified in either CD (reference group WH; thiopurines, HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.53-1.27), p = 0.37; anti-TNFs, HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.34-3.37), p = 0.91] or UC [thiopurines, HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-1.02), p = 0.36; anti-TNFs, HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.92-1.04), p = 0.54]. SA were at significantly increased risk of pancreatitis [HR 2.34 (95% CI 1.37-3.75), p = 0.001] and leucopenia [HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.02-2.84), p = 0.03] with thiopurines, and renal dysfunction with anti-TNFs [HR 4.75 (95% CI 1.55-12.07), p = 0.002]. Interpretation: Treatment efficacy in similar WH and SA IBD patients recruited to the UK IBD BioResource is unaffected by ethnicity but patients from SA ethnic backgrounds are at increased risk of developing pancreatitis and leucopenia with thiopurines, and renal dysfunction with anti-TNFs. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive risk assessment and counselling by clinicians, and emphasise the importance of improving ethnic representation in IBD research. Funding: Bowel Research UK; NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC); NIHR Cambridge BRC.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsCDEthnicityIBDOutcomesTreatmentUC

Identifiers

PMID41497517
PMCPMC12766419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.