Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497512›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Delirium after surgery: a retrospective study of predictors, complications, and screening patterns in the national surgical quality improvement program.

Adriana C Panayi, Sarah Friedrich, Jasmin Rühl, Thomas Schaschinger, Tobias Niederegger, Leonard Knoedler, Samuel Knoedler, Carsten Rendenbach, Sascha Treskatsch, Leila Harhaus and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Adriana C PanayiCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Sarah FriedrichDepartment of Mathematical Statistics and Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Jasmin RühlDepartment of Mathematical Statistics and Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Thomas SchaschingerMedical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tobias NiedereggerMedical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Leonard KnoedlerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Samuel KnoedlerDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Carsten RendenbachCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Sascha TreskatschCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Leila HarhausDepartment of Hand, Replantation, and Microsurgery BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin and Chair of Hand, Replantation, and Microsurgery at the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Max HeilandCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Dennis P OrgillDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gabriel HundeshagenDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, 67071, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative delirium is a serious yet underrecognized complication affecting diverse surgical populations, with profound implications for morbidity, mortality, and long-term cognitive function. Its prediction remains imprecise, and screening practices vary widely. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2021-2023 data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). The study included 217,783 adult surgical patients with documented delirium assessment. Patients were categorized as delirium, non-delirium, or unscreened, with an additional 2.7 million unscreened patients analyzed to assess selection bias in screening. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium. Other outcomes included surgical and medical complications, mortality, length of stay, functional decline, discharge destination and conditions, and perioperative lab values. Multivariable regression models were used to identify independent predictors of delirium and its associated outcomes. Findings: Delirium screening was performed exclusively in patients aged ≥75 years, accounting for 7.3% of all surgical patients. Screening rates declined with advancing age (44% of patients aged 90+ vs 56% aged 75-79), while the proportion screening positive increased sharply (3.1% at 75-79 years vs 12.8% at ≥90 years). Delirium occurred in 10.6% (n = 23,100) of screened patients. Compared with non-delirium patients, those with delirium were older (mean 81.3 vs 79.9 years, p < 0.0001), more functionally dependent, and had higher ASA class and comorbidity burden. Dementia (37% vs 7.9%, p < 0.0001), recent falls (40% vs 18%, p < 0.0001), and urgent/emergency surgery (55% vs 26%, p < 0.0001) were strongly associated. Each 10-min increase in operative time was seen to independently be associated with 2.3% raised odds of delirium (p < 0.0001). Delirium was independently associated with higher 30-day mortality (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.9-3.5), reoperation (OR 2.3, 95% CI 2.1-2.5), surgical complications (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6-1.9), loss of independence (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.5-1.7), and reduced odds of home discharge (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4-0.5). Interpretation: Postoperative delirium is an independent predictor of adverse surgical outcomes yet remains substantially under-screened, with disparities across patient groups. These findings underscore the need for standardized, routine screening and targeted prevention strategies to improve perioperative care. Funding: No funding was received for this study.

Indexed as

Critical careDeliriumPrognosticQuality improvementRisk factorSurgery

Identifiers

PMID41497512
PMCPMC12766415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.