ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Prognostic implications of adverse events associated with CAR-T cell therapy: a population-based global observational study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing CAR-T therapy delivery in the Italian healthcare system: economic and organizational insights in follicular lymphoma.Global & regional health technology assessmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy offers a promising and transformative treatment option for patients with hematologic malignancies, with expanding potential in solid tumors and non-malignant diseases. However, it also exposes recipients to a wide spectrum of treatment-related toxicities, complicating its clinical implementation. The limited sample sizes of clinical studies hinder a comprehensive understanding of how different adverse events (AEs) may impact CAR-T treatment outcomes. Methods: Based on two global real-world drug safety surveillance systems, this observational pharmacovigilance study identified safety signals and death-related AEs in CAR-T cell therapy. All consecutive CAR-T cell-treated cases with AEs reported to the World Health Organization' VigiBase (as of March 2025) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (as of June 2024) were included. We evaluated disproportionate risk and death of all reported AEs by the modified reporting odds ratio method. AE fatality rates, reporting odds ratio of fatality rates among different AEs, and CAR-T cell therapy safety signals were reported. Findings: This analysis included 12,511 CAR-T cell-treated cases in FAERS from 37 countries/regions, 2861 had a fatal outcome. Disproportionality analysis identified 266 AEs as safety signals associated with CAR-T therapy. Of these, 59 high-fatality AEs were revealed (average fatality rate 49.35% [189/383]), such as pulmonary hemorrhage, lactic acidosis, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Cardiac events and respiratory/infection-related complications showed notably high fatality and high reporting frequencies, respectively. We identified 31 low-fatality AEs indicating a comparatively better outcome (average fatality: 11.47% [710/6188]), such as cytokine release syndrome, bradyphrenia, and hypocalcemia, which were predominantly neurologic or immune-related. These prognostically significant AEs were also borne out as death signals for CAR-T cell administration in 5555 CAR-T cell-treated cases from VigiBase. Interpretation: This work establishes a systematic mapping of prognostically significant AEs in CAR-T cell therapy, providing a data-driven resource to inform future research and toxicity management strategies. Given the inherent limitations in pharmacovigilance data, including potential reporting bias and temporal ambiguities, the identified signals require further research to validate causality. Funding: This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2804300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82222047, W2411079), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (22XD1423100), and the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (2022XD057, 2024ZZ1008).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.