ArticleJournal of veterinary research2025
Quantification of brominated flame retardants in soil.
Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Soil quality plays a crucial role for farm animals, particularly those raised under free-range or organic conditions. Substances contaminating soil with a significant impact on food of animal origin are persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Recently, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) were included in this group. Novel brominated flame retardants (nBFRs) may also be included soon because they behave similarly in the environment. The aim of the study was to develop and validate a multicomponent method for determining 10 PBDE congeners and 8 compounds classified as nBFRs in soil. Material and Methods: Three soil samples were taken from potentially contaminated sites and three from theoretically uncontaminated sites. A high-resolution gas chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry method was adapted. Results: The method demonstrated high sensitivity, precision and repeatability. The validated procedure enables quantification of Conclusion: Given the absence of regulatory limits for BFRs in food and feed, and their documented presence in agricultural products, the developed method provides a valuable tool for environmental monitoring and risk assessment related to soil contamination and its potential impact on food safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.