Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497450›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Comparing the performance of dynamic susceptibility contrast and arterial spin labeling for detecting residual and recurrent glioblastoma with deep learning and multishell diffusion MRI.

Louis Gagnon, Diviya Gupta, George Mastorakos, Nathan White, Vanessa Goodwill, Carrie R McDonald, Thomas Beaumont, Christopher Conlin, Tyler M Seibert, Uyen Nguyen and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Louis GagnonDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9583-6647
Diviya GuptaDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
George MastorakosCortechs.ai, San Diego.
Nathan WhiteCortechs.ai, San Diego.
Vanessa GoodwillDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Carrie R McDonaldDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied -Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Thomas BeaumontDepartment of Neurological -Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1940-1096
Christopher ConlinDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Tyler M SeibertDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Uyen NguyenDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Jona Hattangadi-GluthDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied -Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Santosh KesariDepartment of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint Johns' Health Center, Santa Monica.
Jessica D SchulteDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
David PiccioniDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Divya S BolarDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Anders M DaleDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Nikdokht FaridDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-1934
Jeffrey D RudieDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Differentiating recurrent tumor from post-treatment changes remains a major challenge in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. In this work, we compared the performance of 2 different MR perfusion techniques, dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC), and arterial spin labeling (ASL) to differentiate recurrent tumor and post-treatment changes from the volume of cellular tumor segmented from combined Deep Learning and multimodal MRI measurements, including multishell diffusion and perfusion. Methods: In this retrospective study, 137 MRIs from 107 patients with GBM were analyzed. Cellular tumor maps were segmented by 2 radiologists based on imaging, clinical history, and pathology. Multimodal MRI with perfusion and multishell diffusion were inputted into 5 nnU-Net Deep Learning models using either DSC or ASL with combination of multishell diffusion and standard MRI sequences to segment cellular tumor. Models with DSC and ASL were compared using segmentation performance (Dice score) and accuracy to detect recurrent tumor from post-treatment changes (area under the curve [AUC] under the receiver operating characteristic curve). Results: Segmentation performances were similar in both cases, with a median Dice score of 0.75 (IQR: 0.53-0.84) for ASL and 0.76 (IQR: 0.57-0.84). AUC was 0.88 (CI 0.82-0.94) for ASL and 0.86 (CI, 0.80-0.92) for DSC, and this difference was statistically significant ( Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the utility of ASL in regions where susceptibility artifacts decrease the quality of DSC images.

Indexed as

arterial spin labelingcellular tumordeep learning segmentationdynamic susceptibility contrastglioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID41497450
PMCPMC12768508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.