Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497427›Full record

ReviewAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of ICU physicians on antimicrobial use and resistance: a scoping review.

Filipe Teixeira Piastrelli, Giovanna Marssola Nascimento, Haliton Alves de Oliveira Junior, Pablo Kokay Valente, Ícaro Boszczowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Filipe Teixeira PiastrelliInfection Control Department, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7278-783X
Giovanna Marssola NascimentoRede Américas, Infection Control Department, Hospital Samaritano, São Paulo, Brazil.
Haliton Alves de Oliveira JuniorHealth Technology Assessment Center, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-4947
Pablo Kokay ValenteDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2058-3472
Ícaro BoszczowskiInfection Control Department and Hospital Nove de Julho, Rede Américas, Infection Control Department, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0221-3814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify behavioral factors explored in the literature and the theoretical frameworks used to understand antimicrobial prescribing behaviors of ICU physicians. Design: Scoping review following the JBI methodology. Setting: Studies conducted in intensive care units (ICUs) across various healthcare systems. Participants: Physicians working in ICUs; studies involving other healthcare professionals or aggregating data from multiple specialties were excluded. Interventions: Not applicable. Results: From 995 records identified through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science, 18 studies met inclusion criteria. Fourteen were cross-sectional surveys and four used qualitative semi-structured interviews. Knowledge about antimicrobial use and its role in resistance was generally adequate. Attitudes reflected that beliefs, clinical uncertainty, and contextual factors influenced prescribing behaviors. Reported practices highlighted the role of adherence to institutional protocols and guidelines. Despite the behavioral focus, most studies lacked explicit use of theoretical frameworks to guide data collection or interpretation. Conclusions: Antimicrobial prescribing in ICUs is influenced by behavioral determinants that are not consistently evaluated using theoretical models. Future research on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) should integrate behavioral science frameworks to enhance understanding and enable better design of stewardship interventions.

Identifiers

PMID41497427
PMCPMC12766526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.