ReviewCureus2026
Cardiotoxicity of Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation after thoracic radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains a standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, yet the approach poses significant cardiotoxic risks due to the proximity of the esophagus to cardiac structures. This systematic review synthesized recent evidence from observational studies and systematic/narrative reviews published in the last five years, with a focus on quantifying the incidence and timing of cardiac events, examining mechanisms of CRT-induced cardiotoxicity, and evaluating strategies for monitoring and mitigating cardiac risk. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect, restricted to English-language studies published within the past five years, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies specifically investigated CRT in esophageal cancer patients and reported cardiac outcomes. Cardiotoxicity is defined as acute (≤90 days), subacute (3-6 months), or chronic (>6 months) outcomes, including pericardial effusion, arrhythmias, ischemic events, myocardial fibrosis, and heart failure, assessed through imaging, biomarkers, or clinical endpoints. Findings showed that acute events such as pericardial effusion and arrhythmias occur frequently within 90 days post-CRT, while chronic conditions, including ischemic heart disease and heart failure, are more prevalent among long-term survivors. Older patients and those with pre-existing cardiovascular disease were particularly vulnerable to CRT-related cardiac injury. CRT for esophageal cancer carries substantial acute and chronic cardiotoxic risks. Mechanisms involve radiation-induced fibrosis and endothelial injury, compounded by chemotherapy-associated oxidative stress and vasospasm. Clinical implications include the adoption of heart-sparing radiotherapy techniques, systematic biomarker monitoring (BNP, troponin), and cardioprotective agents such as beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors. Advanced imaging (cardiac MRI, echocardiography) offers opportunities for early detection of subclinical injury. Future research should prioritize standardized dosimetry for cardiac substructures (e.g., mean heart dose, LAD constraints) and prospective studies integrating biomarker- and imaging-based cardiac assessment tools to better balance oncologic efficacy with cardioprotection, ultimately improving survival and quality of life in this high-risk patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.