Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497381›Full record

ReviewJDS communications2025

The future of udder health: Antimicrobial stewardship and alternative therapy of bovine mastitis.

Pamela L Ruegg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JDS communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Future of Dairy: Introduction.JDS communications · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pamela L RueggDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although antimicrobial usage is highly restricted in dairy cows, concerns about development and dissemination of resistant bacteria have led to a reexamination of mastitis therapies. In the past, almost all cases of clinical mastitis were treated symptomatically using intramammary antibiotics, and in many regions, most cows received intramammary antibiotic treatments at dry-off. On modern dairy farms, changes in the distribution of etiological agents have reduced the need to give antimicrobials for all mastitis cases. Culture-guided selective treatment protocols for nonsevere clinical mastitis have been adopted on many farms and align with principles of antimicrobial stewardship. Although some antimicrobial therapy is needed to maintain udder health, antimicrobial therapy is not effective or not necessary for resolution of many cases of mastitis. As the use of antimicrobials has declined, many alternative treatments have been explored, but few non-antimicrobial treatments have documented efficacy. The purpose of this paper is to review the concepts of antimicrobial stewardship on dairy farms from the US perspective, with an emphasis on current and future management strategies for udder health.

Identifiers

PMID41497381
PMCPMC12766605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.