ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2025
Universal Utilization of Optimally Timed First Obstetric Ultrasound Among Pregnant Women in a Low-Middle Income Country: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Universal Utilization of Optimally Timed First Obstetric Ultrasound Among Pregnant Women in a Low-Middle Income Country: A Multicenter Prospective Study.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, the World Health Organization guidelines recommend universal utilization of optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound (defined as ultrasound before 24 weeks) in low-middle income countries. However, there is inadequate evidence on this topic from these countries. Our study aimed to determine the rate of utilization of optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound among pregnant women who gave birth at three public hospitals in Ethiopia. Methods: This was a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study conducted on the utilization of optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound among pregnant women who delivered at public hospitals in Ethiopia in 2020. Data were collected prospectively using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 20. Simple descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, and multiple regression analysis were performed as appropriate. Results: A total of 385 participants were included in this study. Approximately 67.5% of pregnant mothers had optimally timed 1 Conclusion: We found that one-third of pregnant women did not utilize optimally timed first obstetric ultrasound, despite obstetric ultrasound services being accessible at public health institutions. Place of first ANC contact and presence of prior major obstetric complication were associated with utilization of optimally dated first obstetric ultrasound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.