Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497356›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2025

Motor Vehicle Driving During Pregnancy Does Not Influence Uterine Contractions.

Riko Araki, Masahito Hitosugi, Kentaro Takahashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Riko ArakiDepartment of Legal Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan, shiga-med.ac.jp.
Masahito HitosugiDepartment of Legal Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan, shiga-med.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5243-8766
Kentaro TakahashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hino Memorial Hospital, Gamou, Shiga, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: No studies have effectively clarified the relationship between uterine contractions and the act of acceleration or driving behaviors in pregnant women. Aims: To confirm the effect of driving a motor vehicle on physiological changes in pregnant women, we examined uterine contractions while driving. Materials and Methods: Seventeen pregnant women with a gestational age of 30-35 weeks were enrolled in this study. Uterine contractions were monitored remotely using a mobile delivery monitoring device. Triaxial acceleration of the vehicle, vehicle velocity, and vehicle kinematics were monitored using a driving recorder. Results: The average number of uterine contractions per 30 min in all participants was 1.0 (range, 0.26-2.0). When comparing the median vehicle velocity during a uterine contraction with that when there were no contractions, no significant difference was found (23 km/hour vs. 31 km/hour, Conclusions: Driving a motor vehicle should be considered a normal activity of daily life in pregnant women and seems unlikely to predispose to preterm birth.

Indexed as

accidentscardiotocographyfetuspregnant womanuterine contraction

Identifiers

PMID41497356
PMCPMC12767404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.