Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497312›Full record

ArticleJournal of obesity2025

Parents' Responses and Reactions to the National Childhood Measurement Programme in a Contemporary Sample of British Children: A Mixed-Method Study.

Florence Sheen, Alice Kininmonth, Zeynep Nas, Alison Fildes, Clare Llewellyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florence SheenSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK, lboro.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6256-4395
Alice KininmonthSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS2 9JT, UK, leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1145-525X
Zeynep NasDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK, ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6675-621X
Alison FildesSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS2 9JT, UK, leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5452-2512
Clare LlewellynDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK, ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0066-2827

Funding

NIHR / Department of Health and Social Care 174868NIHR / Department of Health and Social Care PR-PRU-0916-21001NIHR Policy Research Programme NIHR207678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Parents' support for the National Childhood Measurement Programme (NCMP, England) is typically mixed, with qualitative data from small samples of self-selecting parents highlighting different responses depending on whether their child is classified as a 'healthy' or alternative weight. Objective: Using data from the Gemini cohort study, we explored parents' emotional and behavioural responses to feedback on their children's weight status. Methods: We performed secondary data analysis on data collected when children were 12-13 years old (2019-2021). Their parents completed a questionnaire online, which included (optional) questions about the NCMP. Parents indicated the weight status assigned to their child by the NCMP and answered questions about the weight feedback, including an open-ended question about their emotional responses. Results: There were 567 complete responses to the NCMP questions (55.8% of parents who completed the questionnaire). The majority of children were categorised as 'healthy weight' ( Conclusion: The negative reactions of many parents to NCMP feedback, and the programme itself, highlight the need to involve parents and caregivers in the delivery of the NCMP and framing of feedback. Parent and caregiver input is vital to understand how best to communicate information about children's weight to parents, signpost them to support and what support pathway should be implemented to increase parent uptake.

Indexed as

ParentsPediatric ObesityAdolescentBody WeightChildEmotionsEnglandFemaleHumansMaleParent-Child RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomchild healthchildhood obesitychild weightnational child measurement programmeparent perspectivesweight measurementweight perceptions

Identifiers

PMID41497312
PMCPMC12767035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.