ArticleGeoHealth2026
A Novel Method for Generating Spatially Resolved Synthetic Populations for Health Impact Assessments in Vulnerable Populations.
Article in GeoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The spatial resolution of environmental exposure and sociodemographic population data is often mismatched given limited publicly available population data that complies with privacy requirements for individuals. To address this limitation, we developed a novel matching algorithm to construct a synthetic population at the address-level. To demonstrate how our approach can improve environmental justice (EJ) analyses and health impact assessments (HIAs), we examined sociodemographic patterns of residential proximity to major roadways in Greater Boston (Massachusetts) and HIA results, comparing our method with a random address allocation method. The synthetic population was developed at a census tract-level using US Census microdata and combinatorial optimization methods and then downscaled to address-level parcels by matching building attributes to synthetic households. We designated households within 50 m of a major road "high exposure" and households below state median household income "low income".We found misclassification for individual households (21% of the high exposure/low-income households in the matched data set were identified as such in the random allocation data set). We found modest aggregate differences in matched allocation (3.3% of low-income households had high exposure) compared to random allocation (3.4%). In a HIA, the difference between random and matched allocation would be stronger when there is a strong interactive effect between a sociodemographic effect modifier and exposure on the outcome. Address-level exposure assignment based on synthetic populations can provide more significant and nuanced health impact and EJ analyses. Our novel method can be applied to other regions of the US and expanded to other dimensions of population vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.