SynthesisPeerJ2026
Quality improvement interventions to prevent late-onset sepsis in premature infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Late-onset sepsis (LOS) is a life-threatening complication in preterm infants, with reported incidence rates of 1%-30% that vary by clinical and geographical factors. Quality improvement (QI) bundles integrating infection control, nutrition, and device management show promise in reducing LOS, but evidence remains fragmented due to heterogeneous definitions and mixed study populations. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of QI studies was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (inception to March 19th, 2025). Studies were included if they reported pre-post QI outcomes for LOS in preterm infants (gestational age < 37 weeks), with effect sizes synthesized as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated using Results: Of 9,705 identified studies, 29 (21 for meta-analysis, Conclusion: QI bundles significantly reduce LOS in preterm infants, including VLBW and ELBW subgroups, through core components like multidisciplinary teams, hand hygiene, and central line management. Given outcome variations by diagnostic criteria, standardizing LOS definitions is crucial. These bundles should be integrated into routine care globally. Future efforts should prioritize standardized reporting, antibiotic stewardship, and equitable implementation, especially in low-resource settings, by building on existing evidence and broader healthcare principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.