ArticlePeerJ2026
AI-driven
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditional drug discovery methods, such as high-throughput screening (HTS), are often inefficient and costly, especially in complex areas like oncology. The BRAF V600E mutation is a validated therapeutic target in cancers such as melanoma, thyroid carcinoma, and colorectal cancer. However, existing BRAF inhibitors face challenges like acquired resistance and off-target toxicity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool for designing novel inhibitors more efficiently. Methods: This study employed REINVENT 4, an advanced machine learning (ML) framework using recurrent neural networks and transformer architectures, for targeted generation and property optimization of BRAF V600E inhibitors, integrating reinforcement learning (RL) for drug-likeness optimization and transfer learning (TL) for mutation-specific design. Molecular docking and dynamics simulations were used to evaluate binding affinity and stability. Results: The AI-driven approach generated 41,721 novel BRAF V600E inhibitor candidates with enhanced drug-likeness (mean Quantitative Estimate of Drug-likeness (QED) score: 0.61 ± 0.17 Discussion: This work highlights a reproducible, integrated AI-driven workflow demonstration for targeted inhibitor generation. The generated inhibitors exhibit favorable drug-like properties and inhibitory activity, offering a scalable solution for designing safer cancer therapies. Experimental validation is needed to address potential discrepancies between computational predictions and biological behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.