Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497244›Full record

ArticleJournal of stem cells & regenerative medicine2025

Ureter reconstruction using a biotube in a canine model: A pilot stud.

Noritaka Maeta, Rosuke Iwai, Yohei Mochizuki, Natsuki Akashi, Masahiro Miyabe, Akira Matsuda, Kenji Kutara, Keisuke Sugimoto, Takamasa Itoi, Yasuhide Nakayama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of stem cells & regenerative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A hybrid combination ofFrontiers in urology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Noritaka MaetaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, 1-3 Ikoi-no-oka, Imabari, Ehime 794-8555, Japan.
Rosuke IwaiInstitute of Frontier Science and Technology, Okayama University of Science, 1-1 Ridaicho, kita-ku, Okayama, Okayama 700-0005, Japan.
Yohei MochizukiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, 1-3 Ikoi-no-oka, Imabari, Ehime 794-8555, Japan.
Natsuki AkashiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, 1-3 Ikoi-no-oka, Imabari, Ehime 794-8555, Japan.
Masahiro MiyabeFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, 1-3 Ikoi-no-oka, Imabari, Ehime 794-8555, Japan.
Akira MatsudaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, 1-3 Ikoi-no-oka, Imabari, Ehime 794-8555, Japan.
Kenji KutaraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, 1-3 Ikoi-no-oka, Imabari, Ehime 794-8555, Japan.
Keisuke SugimotoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, 1-3 Ikoi-no-oka, Imabari, Ehime 794-8555, Japan.
Takamasa ItoiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, 1-3 Ikoi-no-oka, Imabari, Ehime 794-8555, Japan.
Yasuhide NakayamaOsaka Laboratory, Biotube Co., Ltd.3-10-1 Senriyama-higashi, Suita, Osaka 565-0842, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteral injuries can lead to renal dysfunction, and conventional treatments such as ureteral stents and autologous tissue grafts have limitations. This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility of a "biotube" created using in-body tissue architecture (iBTA) technology for ureteral reconstruction in a canine model. Methods: Biotubes were implanted in dogs to replace a segment of the ureter. Ureteral stents were used to prevent obstruction. Autopsies were performed 2-3 months after implantation, and the implantation sites were examined histologically to assess tissue regeneration, vascularization, and potential inflammatory reactions. Results: Ureteral stenting effectively prevented obstruction and ensured adequate urinary flow during the observation period. All biotubes were significantly shortened after implantation. No signs of inflammation or foreign body reactions were recorded, indicating good biocompatibility. Although epithelial cell invasion was observed, muscle tissue migration and angiogenesis were limited. Conclusions: Biotubes demonstrate potential as temporary ureteral substitutes; however, improvements in epithelialization and muscle tissue migration are necessary for successful long-term ureteral regeneration. Further experimental studies are required to evaluate their clinical utility as scaffold materials for ureteral reconstruction.

Indexed as

BiotubeIn-body tissue architectureRegenerative medicineTissue engineeringUreter reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID41497244
PMCPMC12766063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.