ArticleGenetics in medicine open2026
Medical genetics needs assessment: An online cross-sectional survey from Nepal.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Medical genetic services remain limited in low- and middle- income countries, such as Nepal, leading to poor health outcomes for individuals affected by genetic disorders. This study aimed to assess perspective and characterize current practices and attitudes toward genetic services among health care providers in Nepal. Methods: A web-based survey was completed by 131 clinicians across multiple disciplines, exploring participant demographics, experience with genetic services, and perceived barriers to genetic testing and counseling. Results: Although 42% of respondents reported regularly caring for patients with suspected genetic disorders, 77% of providers reported difficulties with obtaining genetic testing. The most frequently cited barriers included limited laboratory availability (28%), cost (26%), and logistical challenges (19%). Many respondents reported confidence in discussing disease recurrence risk (63%), treating genetic disorders (40%), and providing genetic counseling (48%), and the majority (86%) expressed interest in furthering their genetic education because only 19% felt their current genetics knowledge was sufficient. Conclusion: This study highlights a clear demand for accessible, affordable, in-country genetic services in Nepal and underscores the need for investment in clinical training and capacity building to improve access and outcomes for patients with genetic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.