ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
3D-printed patient-specific surgical instruments and implants: a technological leap in precision medicine.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic review of 3D-printed surgical devices for austere environments: an evaluation guideline.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing has revolutionized modern surgery by enabling the creation of patient-specific implants and instruments tailored to individual anatomy. Through advanced imaging and computer aided design, 3D-printed devices enhance surgical precision, reduce operative time, and improve functional and aesthetic outcomes across multiple specialties. Clinical evidence from leading countries, including Australia, China, and the United Kingdom, demonstrates successful use of custom titanium spinal and craniofacial implants, restoring complex anatomical structures that standard devices cannot replicate. Technological advances in biocompatible materials such as titanium alloys, PEEK polymers, and bioresorbable composites have expanded the scope of applications, while emerging point-of-care printing facilities allow hospitals to produce customized implants on-site. Despite challenges involving cost, regulatory oversight, and long-term validation, the integration of 3D printing into surgical workflows marks a major step toward personalized medicine. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration and robust clinical trials are essential to establish safety, cost-effectiveness, and broader accessibility of these transformative technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.