ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Regenerative medicine: potential of stem cells and tissue engineering in organ reconstruction.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regenerative medicine offers hope to close the gap between organ failure and transplant availability, but progress remains incremental. This editorial reviews early clinical triumphs, such as cultured skin grafts and tissue-engineered bladders and vaginas, and contrasts them with persistent barriers to whole-organ replacement. We examine stem cell interventions that show functional gains in small trials (for example, cardiopoietic cells and stem-cell-derived islets) yet lack long-term evidence, consistent manufacturing, and proven survival benefit. Tissue engineering advances, including decellularization, perfusion bioreactors, and three-dimensional bioprinting, demonstrate feasibility for simple constructs but fall short for complex organs that require integrated vasculature and multiple specialized cell types. We highlight safety concerns such as thromboembolism and fibrosis, variable product quality, and the risk posed by unregulated clinics. Ethical, regulatory, and economic obstacles, including unclear approval pathways, absent long-term registries, high costs, and potential inequities, threaten translation. To advance patient-centered care, we call for rigorous and transparent clinical trials, shared manufacturing standards, mandatory long-term follow-up, and multidisciplinary collaboration focused on near-term clinically impactful strategies alongside long-term organ engineering research. Humility, vigilance, and alignment of innovation with clinical need are essential if lab-grown organs are to become safe and equitable therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.