Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41497001›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Factors associated with increased risk of perforation of acute appendicitis.

Furat Shani Aoda, Sura Saeed Abood, Ibrahim Falih Noori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Furat Shani AodaDepartment of Surgery, Basra Medical College, University of Basra, Iraq.
Sura Saeed AboodBasra Medical College, University of Basra, Basra, Iraq.
Ibrahim Falih NooriDepartment of Surgery, Basra Medical College, University of Basra, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen encountered in general surgical practice, with the life time risk of 7-9 %. While early treatment usually prevent complications, perforated appendicitis remains a serious concern leading to higher morbidity, longer hospital stay . Objectives: To determine clinical, demographic, laboratory, and radiological predictors of perforation in adults with acute appendicitis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 200 patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis and treated at a major teaching hospital between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into perforated and non-perforated based on intra-operative and histopathological findings. Data on demographics, co-morbidities, symptom duration, laboratory markers, imaging results, complications, and hospital stay were collected. Multivariate logistics regression was applied to identify independent predictors of perforation. Results: Acute appendicitis was more prevalent among patients in their second decade of life (44%) and more common in males (56%) than females (44%). Perforation occurred in 20% of cases. Risk factors significantly associated with perforation include old age, delayed presentation (>48 hours; co-morbidities, particularly diabetes). Elevated WBC count (>18.000\mm Conclusion: Delayed presentation, elevated inflammatory markers, old age, and co-morbidities are strong, independent predictors of appendiceal perforation. Early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention, especially in patients with known risk factors, are crucial to prevent complications such as perforation and minimize hospital stay.

Indexed as

acute appendicitisperforationrisk factors complications

Identifiers

PMID41497001
PMCPMC12767992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.