ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Identification of potential genes and candidate drugs for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy based on bioinformatics.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to find potential biomarkers and drugs in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) by combining bioinformatics and experimental validation strategies. Method: Differentially expressed genes were obtained by analyzing the GSE282182 GEO dataset, after which the weighted gene co-expression network analysis was performed. The intersection of these two analyses yielded core genes. The MCODE module was used to analyze and identify key genes for further study, including gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and immune infiltration analysis. Potential target drugs for the above target genes were obtained from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database. Finally, external database validation and cell experiment validation were performed. Results: A total of 10 core genes ( Conclusion: This study identified 10 core genes, and the relationship between
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.