Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41496968›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an institutional cross-sectional study.

Sunil Basukala, Sunischit Chandra Neupane, Oshan Shrestha, Niranjan Thapa, Sulav Neupane, Sujan Tamang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sunil BasukalaDepartment of Surgery, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9853-3160
Sunischit Chandra NeupaneCollege of Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4628-7652
Oshan ShresthaCollege of Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8655-9168
Niranjan ThapaCollege of Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9043-3368
Sulav NeupaneCollege of Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8218-1647
Sujan TamangCollege of Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6371-0136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), a minimally invasive surgical procedure has largely replaced the open technique for cholecystectomies since the early 1990s and is the treatment of choice for the management of symptomatic gall stone diseases. It has been proved to be an effective and safe procedure in both elective and emergency conditions. However, conversion to open surgery in 2%-10% becomes inevitable. Moreover, surgeons assess difficulty intraoperatively. Preoperative prediction, vital for planning, relies on accurate scoring systems for surgical complexity. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic utility of a preoperative scoring system and identify predictive variables for LC complexity in a tertiary care institution. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among patients where the preoperative grading system stratified patients into three risk groups: low risk (0-1 score), intermediate risk (2-6 scores), and high risk (7-19 scores). The intraoperative Nassar grading categorized patients into four difficulty levels, ranging from Grade 1 (least difficult) to Grade 4 (most difficult). Dichotomization was adopted to provide a clinically useful distinction between "easy" and "difficult" cases, reflecting real-world operative decision-making. This preoperative scoring scale was employed for assessment and analyzed using SPSS-25. Results: Among 405 consenting participants, 41.2% were males, and 58.8% were females. The mean age was 50.49 ± 14.56 years (Mean ± SD), ranging from 17 to 80. The majority had primary diagnosis of biliary colic (31.4%) followed by chronic cholecystitis (31.1%). Thickened gallbladder walls were noted in 40.5%, common bile duct dilation in 17.5%, with 19.5% undergoing preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Anticipated difficult LC was estimated in 158 patients. Intraoperative assessment, utilizing the Nassar grading guideline, revealed that 72.8% of cases were categorized as easy, while 27.2% were classified as difficult. Conclusion: This prospective study demonstrates a clear association between various risk factors and challenging LC. Overview data collection, encompassing demographic, laboratory, and radiological information, supported analytical assessments. However, reliance on a single tertiary care center is a notable limitation, underscoring the need for multicenter studies to validate and identify additional predictors of complexity in LC.

Indexed as

ERCPlaparoscopic cholecystectomyNassar grading

Identifiers

PMID41496968
PMCPMC12768011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.