Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41496945›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Nanocomposite scaffolds in spinal fusion surgery: toward enhanced osteointegration and reduced inflammation.

Hasibullah Aminpoor, Muhammad Zaib, Muhammad Khizar, Qaima Ali, Hasiba Karimi

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hasibullah AminpoorFaculty of Medicine, Kabul University of Medical Sciences "Abu Ali Ibn Sina", Kabul, Afghanistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1817-7800
Muhammad ZaibFaculty of Medicine, Georgian American University, Manifest Medical Research Co, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7675-7161
Muhammad KhizarFaculty of Medicine, Georgian American University, Manifest Medical Research Co, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5229-5052
Qaima AliFaculty of Medicine, Liaquat College of Medicine & Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4771-9955
Hasiba KarimiFaculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-3849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal fusion surgery often fails when bone graft substitutes cannot achieve robust osteointegration or provoke inflammation. Nanocomposite scaffolds such as hybrid biomaterials combining polymers, bioceramics, and nanofillers are emerging solutions. By mimicking bone's extracellular matrix and releasing bioactive ions or growth factors, these scaffolds significantly boost new bone formation. Recent preclinical studies in diverse settings report much higher fusion rates using nanocomposite scaffolds. For example, magnesium-doped hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffolds supplemented with platelet-rich plasma achieved solid fusion in 75% of treated animals versus 12.5% controls. Similarly, rat models in Japan showed 91.6% fusion using nano-hydroxyapatite/polymer scaffolds with low-dose BMP-2. These innovations not only promote osteoblast differentiation and angiogenesis but also allow incorporation of anti-inflammatory components (e.g., cerium oxide or silver nanoparticles) to mitigate post-surgical immune reactions. As international research groups in China, Japan, Iran, and elsewhere advance these materials, ongoing emphasis on standardized reporting and transparency is crucial. Our analysis underscores that nanocomposite scaffolds can bridge nanotechnology with clinical spinal reconstructive practice, justifying further clinical translation.

Indexed as

bone regenerationinflammationnanocomposite scaffoldsosteointegrationspinal fusiontissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41496945
PMCPMC12767949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.