ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Nanocomposite scaffolds in spinal fusion surgery: toward enhanced osteointegration and reduced inflammation.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal fusion surgery often fails when bone graft substitutes cannot achieve robust osteointegration or provoke inflammation. Nanocomposite scaffolds such as hybrid biomaterials combining polymers, bioceramics, and nanofillers are emerging solutions. By mimicking bone's extracellular matrix and releasing bioactive ions or growth factors, these scaffolds significantly boost new bone formation. Recent preclinical studies in diverse settings report much higher fusion rates using nanocomposite scaffolds. For example, magnesium-doped hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffolds supplemented with platelet-rich plasma achieved solid fusion in 75% of treated animals versus 12.5% controls. Similarly, rat models in Japan showed 91.6% fusion using nano-hydroxyapatite/polymer scaffolds with low-dose BMP-2. These innovations not only promote osteoblast differentiation and angiogenesis but also allow incorporation of anti-inflammatory components (e.g., cerium oxide or silver nanoparticles) to mitigate post-surgical immune reactions. As international research groups in China, Japan, Iran, and elsewhere advance these materials, ongoing emphasis on standardized reporting and transparency is crucial. Our analysis underscores that nanocomposite scaffolds can bridge nanotechnology with clinical spinal reconstructive practice, justifying further clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.