ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
A rare case of isolated myocysticercosis of the arm: a case report and literature review.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Importance: Isolated myocysticercosis is a rare manifestation of cysticercosis, where a single cysticercus infests an individual skeletal muscle. We present a case of an isolated myocysticercosis in the forearm to highlight the atypical presentation, the diagnostic challenges, and the management options. Case Presentation: A 25-year-old lady presented with a 2 × 2 cm swelling over the anterolateral aspect of her right forearm for 3 months, which was firm, non-fluctuant, and fixed to the underlying muscle but not the skin. She had no history of eating pork or being around pigs. An ultrasound revealed a well-defined cystic nodule. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan suggested myocysticercosis or vascular malformations as the two differentials, following which the cyst was surgically removed and the histopathological examination confirmed myocysticercosis. Additional screening MRI imaging revealed no lesions in the brain or the eyes. Clinical Discussion: The life cycle of Conclusion: This case demonstrates that histopathological examination remains the cornerstone for the diagnoses of any parasite lesion where the clinical and radiological findings are dubious. Isolated myocysticercosis can be treated with surgical excision alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.