Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41496932›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Geometric and biomechanical perspectives on ulnar nerve compression in cubital tunnel syndrome: pathomechanics and surgical strategies.

Tianyou Hu, Hongxiang Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tianyou HuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7764-2982
Hongxiang ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common upper extremity nerve entrapment disorder, characterized by compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Traditional surgical classifications have emphasized anatomical depth or technical complexity, but they inadequately account for the geometric and biomechanical factors influencing nerve tension, strain, and recovery. This review introduces a geometric model that conceptualizes the ulnar nerve's trajectory during elbow flexion as a sharply angled triangle, where greater curvature correlates with higher mechanical stress and elongation. Surgical strategies are reclassified based on their degree of geometric correction: noncorrective, indirect corrective, and direct path reconfiguration. We critically analyze the biomechanical implications and clinical outcomes of each technique, supported by dynamic imaging, cadaveric data, and neurophysiological metrics such as motor conduction velocity and grip strength recovery. Submuscular transposition achieves the most complete path realignment and consistently demonstrates superior functional results. The review also highlights gaps in current literature, particularly the lack of quantifiable biomechanical outcome measures such as nerve curvature, strain, and excursion. We propose a new classification system and recommend incorporating geometric metrics into future surgical planning and comparative studies. By reframing surgical choices around path correction rather than procedural nomenclature, this model offers a more precise, individualized approach to CuTS management.

Indexed as

cubital tunnel syndromeminimally invasive surgical proceduresnerve regenerationsurgical proceduresulnar nerve

Identifiers

PMID41496932
PMCPMC12768107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.