ArticleJVS-vascular science2025
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound microbubble uptake and abnormal plasma biomarkers are seen in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Article in JVS-vascular science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiparametric Abdominal Ultrasound as a Source of Imaging Biomarkers in Predictive and Personalized Medicine: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth is unpredictable. We hypothesize that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging and plasma inflammatory biomarkers (PIBs) may detect AAA wall inflammation. Methods: Patients with an AAA diameter ≥4 cm had CEUS and PIB testing at enrollment and every 6 months. Microbubble replenishment was analyzed via manually drawn regions of the aortic wall. Aneurysm growth, rupture, and repair were recorded. PIB testing was analyzed using biomarker panels. Independent and paired Results: A total of 59 patients were enrolled (mean age, 68.8 ± 8.6 years; 13.6% female; 93.2% White). Mean AAA size on presentation was 41.6 ± 6.7 mm. Microbubble uptake was seen in 36 patients (61%). Patients with AAA had high baseline levels of Cystatin C and interferon-γ and low levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Microbubble uptake was seen in 59% of patients with ≥5 mm AAA growth but was not predictive of growth on logistic regression. Conclusions: We have demonstrated that microbubble uptake with CEUS is seen in the aortic wall/intraluminal thrombus of patients with AAA. CEUS and PIBs could provide insight into aneurysm behavior in newly diagnosed AAA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.