ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026
Modeling the pathways from antisocial media exposure to subjective well-being through school-based victimization in Nigeria.
Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pervasive integration of digital media into daily life is reshaping how individuals encounter and internalize harmful contents. Unrestricted access exposes students to emotionally disruptive materials, including depictions of violence, substance use, and harassment, raising concerns about its impact on well-being. This study examines a serial mediation model linking antisocial media exposure to subjective well-being (SWB) through school-based victimization as sequential pathways. Using data from 326 high school students in Nigeria, we applied partial least squares structural equation modeling to test hypothesized relationships. Results indicate that antisocial media exposure was not directly associated with SWB but significantly predicted experiences of teacher and peer victimization. Peer victimization mediated the relationship between antisocial media exposure and SWB (β = -0.023, 95% CI: [-0.054, -0.004], p < 0.05). Furthermore, antisocial media exposure increased the likelihood of teacher victimization, which facilitated peer victimization, ultimately compromising SWB (β = -0.030, 95% CI: [-0.058, -0.011], p < 0.05). Effects varied by gender and academic level, underscoring intersectional risks linked to media exposure. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions addressing both teacher and peer victimization in resource-constrained educational contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.