Trial reportPulmonary medicine2025
The Effect of Heated, Humidified High-Flow Air in COPD Patients With Chronic Bronchitis.
Trial report in Pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03959982 (The Effect of Heated, Humidified High-flow Air in COPD Patients With Chronic Bronchitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Heated, Humidified High-flow Air in COPD Patients With Chronic Bronchitis
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effect of Heated, Humidified High-Flow Air in COPD Patients With Chronic Bronchitis.Pulmonary medicine · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Heated, humidified high-flow air (HHHFA) has been shown to reduce exacerbations in patients with COPD or bronchiectasis with significant sputum production. This pilot study evaluated the short-term effects of nocturnal HHHFA in COPD patients with chronic bronchitis. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Participants with COPD, chronic bronchitis, and ≥ 2 exacerbations in the prior year were randomized to either nocturnal HHHFA or usual care. Assessments included sleep quality, dyspnea, quality of life, cough, lung function, imaging, and exercise capacity at baseline and 6 weeks. Results: Of 11 eligible participants, seven completed the study (four intervention, three control). Baseline characteristics were generally similar, though the intervention group had a higher BMI and a lower emphysema percentage. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Nocturnal HHHFA over 6 weeks did not improve clinical or imaging outcomes in this small cohort of COPD patients with chronic bronchitis. The study was likely underpowered due to recruitment challenges. Larger trials are needed to assess the potential of HHHFA in this population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03959982.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.