Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41496795›Full record

ArticleJBMR plus2026

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the denosumab biosimilar FKS518 and reference denosumab in healthy subjects: the Lumiade-1 study.

Anna Dryja, Mateusz Cieślak, Piotr Sobieraj, Peter Szeles, Adriano L S de Souza, Joelle Monnet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBMR plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna DryjaMTZ Clinical Research powered by PRATIA, 02-172 Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz CieślakMTZ Clinical Research powered by PRATIA, 02-172 Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr SobierajMTZ Clinical Research powered by PRATIA, 02-172 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0662-8678
Peter SzelesDepartment of Clinical Development, Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim, CH-1262 Eysins, Switzerland.
Adriano L S de SouzaDepartment of Clinical Development, Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim, CH-1262 Eysins, Switzerland.
Joelle MonnetDepartment of Clinical Development, Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim, CH-1262 Eysins, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0601-6630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that increases BMD, inhibits bone resorption and reduces fracture risk. This double-blind, randomized, parallel group study aimed to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence and compare the pharmacodynamic (PD), safety and immunogenicity profiles of the proposed denosumab biosimilar FKS518 vs the originator (reference) denosumab. Healthy males (28-55 yr) were randomized to a single 60 mg s.c. injection of FKS518 or the reference denosumab (Prolia) and were followed for 40 wk after drug injection. The primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity, AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum observed serum concentration. A total of 213 subjects were injected. Pharmacokinetic equivalence was demonstrated as the 90% CIs for the geometric least squares means ratio FKS518/reference denosumab for the three primary PK parameters were fully contained within the predefined bioequivalence limits. Secondary PK, PD, safety, and local tolerability endpoints also supported the similarity of FKS518 and reference denosumab. No anti-drug antibodies were detected in either treatment group. These results demonstrate that FKS518 is equivalent to originator denosumab with respect to PK profile.

Indexed as

biosimilardenosumabequivalenceFKS518immunogenicitypharmacodynamicspharmacokineticstolerability

Identifiers

PMID41496795
PMCPMC12766911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.